LaurieKnight.net

Pancalia schwarzella (I think)

Purchase RF License (iStockPhoto) Purchase a print

Comments


buddy icon Johan J.Ingles-Le Nobel
10 years ago
heya, could be schwarzella or leuwenhoekella - generally in cases of doubt between two I usually plump for the less rare one which according to Sterling and Parsons is the latter. That said little between them. Micros are a pig to ident :)
buddy icon laurie.knight
10 years ago
[http://www.flickr.com/photos/jingleslenobel] I can't see any white on the antennae, apparently that means it should be schwarzella. See this shot, it's not ideal but I think you can see most of the intact antenna: www.photomacrography.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=21380 )
buddy icon Andrew Cooper - On and Off!
9 years ago
Wow, that is truly magnificent!


Login to Flickr and authorise this site to post a comment

Note, the only permission levels on the flickr API are read, write and delete. The site needs write permission from you to create comments. The site will not do anything to your account/photos and will Only use this permission to pass your comments onto flickr.

You must authorise/log in to Flickr to comment on photos as the photos and their comments are all pulled into this website from Flickr using their API.

Authorise site or Go to Flickr to comment

Taxonomies

Species : Pancalia schwarzella

Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
Arthropoda
Subphylum
Hexapoda
Class
Insecta
Subclass
Pterygota
Superorder
Endopterygota
Order
Lepidoptera
Suborder
Glossata
Infraorder
Heteroneura
Superfamily
Gelechioidea
Family
Cosmopterigidae
Genus
Pancalia
Species
Pancalia schwarzella

Suggest correction

Photo meta data

Number of slices
200
Distance between slices
1 micron
Objective lens used
super duper lens
Aperture set on lens
f28.75

Tags


pancaliaschwarzella pancalia schwarzella micromoth micro moth macro irridescent